Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Auditing a firewall rulebase
From: "arvind doraiswamy" <arvind.doraiswamy () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 20:49:12 +0530
Hey Guys,
What parameters would you look for if you audited a large rulebase for
an enterprise firewall? These are a few I could think of. Anything
else that you guys consistently look at when managing/auditing your
firewalls? Do take note that I'm talking just singularly about the
rule-base and not other configuration information i.e: I'm not looking
at things like -- Low console session timeout OR Telnet admin
interface open etc. I'm looking at just the rulebase this time around.
Here are my parameters:
Rules which have "any" or an equivalent keyword in them
Rules where an entire subnet has been granted access to a resource
Rules where a range of IP addresses has been granted access to a resource
Rules where a large range of ports has been opened to an IP Address / Addresses
Rules where there are design issues in the protocol itself
eg. Unencrypted traffic
Rules which are redundant and can be removed from the rulebase
Thanks
Arvind
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Auditing a firewall rulebase arvind doraiswamy (May 19)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase Darden, Patrick S. (May 20)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase Chuck Benson (May 27)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase kevin horvath (May 20)
- null routes and VPN's Kerry Milestone (May 20)
- Re: null routes and VPN's Lord Sporkton (May 27)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase Lord Sporkton (May 20)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase R. DuFresne (May 27)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase Paul Melson (May 20)
- Re: Auditing a firewall rulebase Darden, Patrick S. (May 20)
