Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity?
From: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdyson () treachery net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:15:25 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Gommers, Joep wrote:
The reason for all the scans on port 22 are not worms, it's the whole scriptkiddie world that is scanning your ports for SSH versions:
The reason why I initially suspected worm activity was manyfold,
but another reason was that only certain netblocks were apparently
targeted. I haven't seen such concerted scanning occuring on the other
netblocks on which I manage servers.
Anyway, i suggest you patch ssh to > 3.0.1(this has a local exploit). Or use a telnetd > 0.17.
I wouldn't use telnetd if you bribed me with a thousand redheaded
girls, each with a distinct Irish brogue...(though that would be a good
start). ;)
For my own part, on top of upgrading to the latest versions of
SSHd, I'm recommending that folks utilize IPchains or IPFilter to
reinforce their explicitly-defined AllowHosts directives in sshd_config.
These measure in themselves should greatly mitigate both the present (and
hopefully, future) threat of successful remote attack on SSHd.
- -Jay
( ( _______
)) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--.
C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson () treachery net -----<) | = |-'
`--' `--' `---------- Si vis pacem, para bellum. ----------' `------'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.
iQCVAwUBPBaTlrlDRyqRQ2a9AQHImAP/RXDBmE4CHr3YP3VAfx3LK9Pn0WbbpwN0
7u7Tcg2qAA+KoSPNTyOvgk9n7UjJZiQ7oXK2IuR9JSOG7gk3LYc/doTjQQMCYTK+
HPdGYLutE3i6MKzdNuKwsU88W5Z9ZflQTnPUx+fnohIu87nJ5c7ihWUz7ZL7fjtz
ZyBfv//N0m8=
=HCMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity?, (continued)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Neil Dickey (Dec 10)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Jay D. Dyson (Dec 10)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Schroeder, Eric (Dec 10)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Jay D. Dyson (Dec 10)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Markus Friedl (Dec 10)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Schroeder, Eric (Dec 10)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Florian Weimer (Dec 10)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Markus Friedl (Dec 11)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Florian Weimer (Dec 10)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Gommers, Joep (Dec 11)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Damien Miller (Dec 11)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Jay D. Dyson (Dec 11)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Bertrand Lupart (Dec 12)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Jonathan Bloomquist (Dec 13)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? jon schatz (Dec 11)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Markus Friedl (Dec 12)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Neil Dickey (Dec 10)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Gommers, Joep (Dec 12)
- RE: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Gommers, Joep (Dec 12)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Paul Gear (Dec 13)
- Re: Voluminous SSHd scanning; possible worm activity? Sam Ferrell (Dec 14)
