nanog mailing list archives
[no subject]
From: "Matt Mathis" <mathis () pele psc edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 94 13:15:43 -0400
A safer position, which would be easier for many people to swallow, would be to retain the AUP as a legal entropy, but lift the requirement to use routing to enforce it. (Oops I mean entity. Talk about Freud!). A further refinement: allow the case where commercial traffic traverses the NSFnet becasue routing technology is not sufficient to support an existing entirely commercial path between subscribers, as long as there are contracts and sufficient facilitys in place to support the path. --MM-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- [no subject] Stephen Wolff (Apr 15)
- Re: your mail Hans-Werner Braun (Apr 15)
- [no subject] Matt Mathis (Apr 15)
- Re: your mail Stephen Wolff (Apr 15)
- Re: your mail Simon Poole (Apr 15)
- Re: your mail Peter S. Ford (Apr 15)
- [no subject] Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: your mail Stephen Wolff (Apr 15)
- Waiving the AUP for CIDRization Pushpendra Mohta (Apr 15)
