Re: Smurf Amps List

[Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>]

On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Jared Mauch wrote:

>       I originally wasn't going to make the whole thing avaiable, but
> there was a posting a few ago on nanog listing a number of blocks, so
> I feel obliged to post a link to my results.  I plan on putting a nice
> backend behind this and making it a queryable database that checks itself
> frequently, but I've not had the time.
>
> This list is the result of about a weeks worth of
> work probing a total of 48394 netblocks.  Of those
> netblocks, 6425 were found to respond with more than
> one packet sent to the network address.  broadcast
> address of 255 was not checked, nor anything else
> than the list here.  This means 13.28% of netblocks out
> there are "broken".

If you added a scan to check the class B nets as /24 nets I am pretty sure
you would get a huge increase in broken nets. 

-----
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se