nanog mailing list archives
Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 21:35:19 -0500
I'm wondering whether the ISP community has a clear preference for either yes-do-detection or no-we-want-the-problems-fixed. Comments appreciated.I think that most ISP's would prefer that problems were fixed.
the choice seems
o when it breaks, the noc gets the call, debugs it, and it gets fixed
o when it breaks, the software does successive guesswork back-offs until
it makes it through. the performance sucks big-time, the customer
thinks the isp is at fault, but the noc does not get called and the
real problem never gets fixed.
randy
Current thread:
- should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Vern Paxson (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Chris Cappuccio (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Jeff Mcadams (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Greg A. Woods (Nov 19)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Dave Morton (Nov 19)
