nanog mailing list archives
Re: RoadRunner abuse?
From: Mitch Halmu <mitch () netside net>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 3 May 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
Sorry to post this, but it appears that past emails to RoadRunner re a spammer (sending out attachments to boot) have been ineffective. Only ~150kB, but multiply that by however many victims... I'd think and hope *someone* cares. Back to on-topic material. I just wanted to see if there's anyone out there before I go whining to MAPS, et al.
Good luck. Roadrunner is a (presumed paying) MAPS customer: ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- abuse () rr com postmaster () rr com ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to vamx01.mgw.rr.com.:
MAIL From:<root () netside net>
<<< 553 5.3.0 Mail from 205.159.140.2 rejected,see http://mail-abuse.org/rbl/enduser.html 501 abuse () rr com,postmaster () rr com... Data format error NetSide is a MAPS et al. blocked ISP. We have plenty of rr.com spam examples, but are unable to notify them. If anyone cares... --Mitch NetSide
Current thread:
- RoadRunner abuse? E.B. Dreger (May 03)
- Re: RoadRunner abuse? Mitch Halmu (May 03)
- Re: RoadRunner abuse? Hermann Wecke (May 03)
- RE: RoadRunner abuse? Vivien M. (May 03)
- Re: RoadRunner abuse? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: RoadRunner abuse? Hermann Wecke (May 03)
- Re: RoadRunner abuse? Mitch Halmu (May 03)
