nanog mailing list archives
Re: Selfish routing
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:35:48 -0400
In a message written on Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:52:16PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
One antidote to selfish routing, the two researchers found, is more capacity. Optimum overall system speeds can be restored despite selfish routing by either doubling the number of lanes on a highway or doubling the bandwidth of a communications link. Particularly in the case of roads, however, that is rarely practical or even desirable.
Primary path gets full.
Provider routes to secondary path, which is better than primary path
when full.
Users and provider discover life would be better when primary path had
more bandwidth.
News at 11.
I mean, really, the fact that a secondary path is worse than a primary
path with no capacity is a no brainer, couldn't these people be doing
something more useful?
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Selfish routing, (continued)
- Re: Selfish routing alex (Apr 27)
- Re: Selfish routing Stephen Sprunk (Apr 25)
- Re: Selfish routing alex (Apr 25)
- Re: Selfish routing Stephen Sprunk (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing alex (Apr 27)
- Re: Selfish routing Scott Granados (Apr 27)
- Re: Selfish routing Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 25)
- Re: Selfish routing alex (Apr 25)
- Re: Selfish routing Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 25)
- Re: Selfish routing Barney Wolff (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Mike Lloyd (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Stephen Sprunk (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Mike Lloyd (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Barney Wolff (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Mike Lloyd (Apr 26)
- Re: Selfish routing Jack Bates (Apr 27)
