nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question about 223/8

From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:54:35 -0500


Jared Mauch wrote:


        While the issue on the surface appears to be fairly pety, the
223/8 block was assigned to a RIR.  223.255.255/24 is reserved per rfc.

And this is why my question. RFC 3330 states that 223.255.255/24 can beassigned to a RIR. What gives one RFC weight over another? Is it anissue of RFC type or obsoletion status?


-Jack

Current thread:

Question about 223/8 Jack Bates (Apr 28)
- Re: Question about 223/8 Jared Mauch (Apr 28)
  - Re: Question about 223/8 Jack Bates (Apr 29)
    - Re: Question about 223/8 bmanning (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about 223/8 Michael . Dillon (Apr 29)
  - Re: Question about 223/8 jlewis (Apr 29)