nanog mailing list archives
Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:24:16 +0300
Gadi Evron wrote:
Between spam, spyware and worms, not to mention scans ad attacks, I suppose that a large percentage of the Internet already is pay-for-junk?
No. Most of the Internet is p2p file sharing, which does not fall into the categories mentioned. (at least mostly it doesn't)
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: botted hosts, (continued)
- Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- RE: botted hosts Ejay Hire (Apr 07)
- Re: botted hosts Sean Donelan (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Paul Vixie (Apr 04)
- so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] J.D. Falk (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] John Dupuy (Apr 04)