Re: IPv6 Address Planning

[Kevin Loch <kloch () hotnic net>]

Roy Badami wrote:
> And on that vein perhaps it's prudent for people using network
> prefixes longer than /64 to take care to ensure that the bit positions
> in the IPv6 address that should correspond to the u and g bits in the
> modified EUI-64 interface ID (according to RFC 3513) are both set to

Is there any known use for those bits?

- Kevin