Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?

[Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>]

* ops.lists () gmail com (Suresh Ramasubramanian) [Sat 12 May 2007, 05:25 CEST]:
> On 5/11/07, K K <kkadow () gmail com> wrote:
> > Probably 98% of the mailbox is from are spammers who've harvested or 
> > randomly targeted abuse@ addresses for male enhancement, maybe 1.99%
> So?  A little filtering should handle a lot of that, procmail even.
> At least to file the obvious crap into a different folder that can be 
> looked at and blown away

Difficult, as spam complaints generally include the original spam and 
thus trigger SpamAssassin (almost) just as hard.

Otherwise, looking forward to your 98% effective procmail recipe


        -- Niels.