RE: Comparison of freeware open source switch software?

["Raymond Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net>]

> > Not necessarily true anymore.  Look for SwitchDev, which is
> > incorporated into the Linux kernel , is undergoing continuous
> > improvement, and allows the kernel to offload forwarding rules to the
> hardware.
>
> The overall architecture of openswitch, however, seems (to me) to be
> focused on software implementations, rather than hardware.

I suppose that could be a fair statement, to a certain degree.  But when you strip away all the abstracted things it 
does, and get into the core of the product, you find an OpenFlow engine, which at the heart, is a mechanism for 
defining traffic rules.  Many of those rules translate easily into the kernel's forwarding information base.  And the 
kernel's FIB can easily be two-way sync'd with hardware.

So, to take this to the logical conclusion, other than for the interesting rules which can be created in OVS or FRR, it 
is possible to do away with OVS/FRR, and use only Linux itself with iproute2 and bridge commands to drive the hardware 
directly with no further abstraction or vendor black boxes.

And, rather than using a J or a C syntax, you use an /etc/network/interfaces syntax for permanence. 

https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/
Raymond Burkholder


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.